TrustFinance is trustworthy and accurate information you can rely on. If you are looking for financial business information, this is the place for you. All-in-One source for financial business information. Our priority is our reliability.

TrustFinance Global Insights
Feb 02, 2026
2 min read
9

EU Industry Chief Stephane Sejourne, backed by over 1,100 CEOs, is advocating for a robust 'Made in Europe' industrial policy. The strategy aims to protect the continent's strategic sectors by establishing a preference for locally manufactured goods, particularly when European public funds are involved.
The call to action comes ahead of the proposed implementation of the Commission’s Industrial Accelerator Act. The move is a direct response to protectionist policies like China's 'Made in China' and the U.S. 'Buy American' initiatives. Support for the proposal comes from a wide range of industries, including steelmaker ArcelorMittal, pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk, and airline group Air France KLM. Notably, major automakers were absent from the list of signatories.
This proposed policy has created a significant divide among EU member states. While nations like France champion the idea to bolster local industries, others, including Sweden and the Czech Republic, express concerns. They argue that 'buy local' requirements could deter foreign investment, inflate prices in government tenders, and ultimately undermine the EU's global competitiveness.
The debate highlights a critical tension between protecting domestic industries and maintaining a competitive, open market. The outcome of the Industrial Accelerator Act will be pivotal in shaping Europe's future economic landscape and its stance on global trade.
Q: What is the core idea behind the 'Made in Europe' strategy?
A: The strategy proposes that European public money should be used to support European production and create quality local jobs, giving preference to EU-made products in strategic sectors.
Q: Why is the proposal controversial within the EU?
A: It is controversial because some member states fear it will lead to protectionism, higher costs, and reduced foreign investment, while others see it as essential for industrial security.
Source: Investing.com

TrustFinance Global Insights
AI-assisted editorial team by TrustFinance curating reliable financial and economic news from verified global sources.
Related Articles

02 Feb 2026
SYNO Capital Group Files for Nasdaq IPO