TrustFinance is trustworthy and accurate information you can rely on. If you are looking for financial business information, this is the place for you. All-in-One source for financial business information. Our priority is our reliability.

TrustFinance Global Insights
May 15, 2026
2 min read
12

Institutional investors significantly increased their exposure to private credit funds during the first quarter of the year, according to a Reuters analysis of 13F filings with U.S. securities regulators. This trend emerges despite growing risk aversion in the market.
The analysis of publicly traded business development companies (BDCs) showed a clear pattern of institutional buying. Major asset managers like KKR and Blue Owl have noted renewed interest in direct lending from institutions, even as returns from private credit strategies have cooled. For instance, Apollo’s direct lending funds returned just 0.5% in the quarter.
Filings as of March 31 showed that 11.5% of over 6,000 filers increased their holdings in a universe of 45 funds, while only 3.2% reduced their stakes. Additionally, 279 institutional investors initiated new positions, signaling confidence in the sector's long-term value proposition.
The data suggests that institutional players are capitalizing on what they perceive as a favorable risk-reward environment in private credit. The trend indicates a strategic shift, as institutions return to direct lending while retail investor interest has been more subdued.
Q: What are 13F filings?
A: They are quarterly reports required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from institutional investment managers, disclosing their long equity holdings.
Q: What is private credit?
A: Private credit is non-bank lending where debt is not issued or traded on public markets, typically provided to private companies.
Source: Investing.com

TrustFinance Global Insights
AI-assisted editorial team by TrustFinance curating reliable financial and economic news from verified global sources.
Related Articles

16 May 2026
Ackman & Loeb Diverge on Big Tech Bets in Q1