trustfinance-logo

TrustFinance

  • 新

  • 博客

CN

    • 投票
    • 奖项
    • 奖励新
  • 行业
    • 法规
    • 比较
  • 博客
    • 关于我们
    • 推荐书
    • 法律
    • 为什么TrustFinance
    • TrustFinance如何运作
    • 报告
外汇
加密货币
股票
金融
媒体
科技
TrustFinance logo

TrustFinance

最值得信赖的平台

办公室: 63 Chulia Street, OCBC Centre East, #15-01, Singapore, 049514
主要联系方式:
[email protected]-技术支持和咨询
[email protected]-免费在线声誉咨询服务
[email protected]-销售咨询
营业时间:周一至周五 (11:00-19:00)
时区(新加坡)

功能

  • 首页
  • 投票
  • 奖项
  • 奖励新
  • 博客
  • 法规
  • 对比

行业

  • 加密货币
  • 金融
  • 外汇
  • 媒体
  • 股票
  • 技术

商业版

  • 商业主页
  • 申请演示
  • 解决方案
  • 套餐与定价
  • 活动

我们的公司

  • 关于我们
  • 推荐信
  • TrustFinance如何运作
  • 为什么选择TrustFinance
  • 法律
  • 报告
  • 网站地图
DMCA.com Protection Status
版权所有 © TrustFinance 2022 | V.2.0

TrustFinance是您可以信赖的值得信赖且准确的信息。如果您正在寻找金融商业信息,这里就是您的最佳选择。金融商业信息的一站式来源。我们的首要任务是可靠性。

功能
  • 首页
  • 投票
  • 奖项
  • 奖励新
  • 博客
  • 法规
  • 对比
行业
  • 加密货币
  • 金融
  • 外汇
  • 媒体
  • 股票
  • 技术
商业版
  • 商业主页
  • 申请演示
  • 解决方案
  • 套餐与定价
  • 活动
我们的公司
  • 关于我们
  • 推荐信
  • TrustFinance如何运作
  • 为什么选择TrustFinance
  • 法律
  • 报告
  • 网站地图

社区

办公室: 63 Chulia Street, OCBC Centre East, #15-01, Singapore, 049514
主要联系方式:
[email protected]-技术支持和咨询
[email protected]-免费在线声誉咨询服务
[email protected]-销售咨询
营业时间:周一至周五 (11:00-19:00)
时区(新加坡)
DMCA.com Protection Status
版权所有 © TrustFinance 2022 | V.2.0

TrustFinance是您可以信赖的值得信赖且准确的信息。如果您正在寻找金融商业信息,这里就是您的最佳选择。金融商业信息的一站式来源。我们的首要任务是可靠性。

外汇
navigate next零售经纪人navigate next A.C.T.

關於公司

  • 概覽
  • 資訊
  • 評論
Service not available icon
此服务在您所在的地区不可用。
A
A
A

A.C.T.

National flag images
National flag images

英国

成立于

2002 (24 年)

成立

最后在线: 最近无活动

访问网站

暂无 TrustScore分数不足,无法显示趋势。

成为首个为该公司评分和评论的用户。

综合得分
牌照
--/40
评论
--/60
0 条评价

由 TrustFinance 提供

暂无 TrustScore分数不足,无法显示趋势。

成为首个为该公司评分和评论的用户。

FTD LIMITED

FTD LIMITED

(505 评论)

foundedInBritish Virgin Islands

2017

(9 年)

安全信息 :

BVI FSC

安全信息

警告

该公司目前 未经证实.

请注意潜在风险!

Note icon

牌照

甲級牌照

由全球知名监管机构颁发,这些许可证通过严格的合规性、资金隔离、保险和定期审计,确保最高程度的交易者保护。争议解决和遵守 AML/CTF 标准进一步提高了安全性。

B 級牌照

由受尊敬的区域监管机构授予,这些许可证提供强大的安全措施,例如资金隔离、财务报告和补偿计划。虽然没有等级 1 那么严格,但它们提供可靠的区域保护。

C 級牌照

由新兴市场的监管机构颁发,这些许可证提供基本保护,例如最低资本要求和 AML 政策。监管较不严格,因此交易者应谨慎行事并验证安全措施。

D 級牌照

来自监管最少的司法管辖区,这些许可证通常缺乏关键保护,例如资金隔离和保险。虽然它们对运营弹性很有吸引力,但它们对交易者构成较高的风险。

公司資料

building-icon

了解 A.C.T.

顯示更多

navigate-icon
building-icon

公司資料

了解 A.C.T.

A.C.T. BROKERS LTD operates as an international online broker providing access to over 1,000 financial instruments through its trading platform. The company's stated mission is to offer exceptional trading conditions, including tight spreads, advanced technology, and dedicated customer support, to a global client base.

顯示更多

navigate-icon

行业

  • 外汇 零售经纪人主要
  • 金融 其他服务

软件

没有可用的数据

看起来这个部分是空的。 请尽快回来获取更新!

联络

location-contact-icon

-

website-contact-icon

-

phone-contact-icon

-

email-contact-icon

-

社交

公司尚未更新其信息。

评论

Social scout image

Social Scout

看看Social Scout发现的A.C.T.

Trustfinance icon

由TrustFinance AI分析提供

A.C.T. 评论

评论

总计 0

过滤器

5 星星

0%

4 星星

0%

3 星星

0%

2 星星

0%

1 星星

0%

排序依据

过滤器

睇A.C.T.嘅用戶仲睇…

building-icon

IUX

88
building-icon

XM

85
building-icon

FXGT

25
building-icon

Deriv

51
building-icon

Exness

53
building-icon

IUX

88
building-icon

XM

85
building-icon

FXGT

25
building-icon

Deriv

51
building-icon

Exness

53

新聞

building-icon

TrustFinance 情報機構

研究日期: 5月 14, 2026

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has launched a dedicated Data Broker Enforcement Strike Force to enhance oversight of data brokers under the California Delete Act and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). The Delete Act, effective since 2024, imposes new registration and compliance requirements on data brokers, including an annual fee and obligations to report consumer data deletion requests. Non-compliance can lead to significant fines and operational restrictions. Businesses must assess their status as data brokers, register annually, implement deletion request processes, and ensure compliance with data handling regulations to avoid penalties.

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has launched a dedicated Data Broker Enforcement Strike Force to enhance oversight of data brokers under the California Delete Act and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). The Delete Act, effective since 2024, imposes new registration and compliance requirements on data brokers, including an annual fee and obligations to report consumer data deletion requests. Non-compliance can lead to significant fines and operational restrictions. Businesses must assess their status as data brokers, register annually, implement deletion request processes, and ensure compliance with data handling regulations to avoid penalties.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) reported record-breaking False Claims Act (FCA) recoveries of over $6.8 billion in 2025, with more than $5.7 billion related to healthcare. The report highlights aggressive enforcement trends, including a focus on improper marketing practices, kickbacks, and substandard care. Key cases involved significant settlements against pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers for fraudulent activities. The DOJ emphasized the importance of compliance and the role of whistleblowers in these enforcement actions. Stakeholders are advised to enhance compliance strategies in light of the evolving enforcement landscape.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) reported record-breaking False Claims Act (FCA) recoveries of over $6.8 billion in 2025, with more than $5.7 billion related to healthcare. The report highlights aggressive enforcement trends, including a focus on improper marketing practices, kickbacks, and substandard care. Key cases involved significant settlements against pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers for fraudulent activities. The DOJ emphasized the importance of compliance and the role of whistleblowers in these enforcement actions. Stakeholders are advised to enhance compliance strategies in light of the evolving enforcement landscape.

The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to resolve a split among circuit courts regarding freight broker liability under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA). The cases Total Quality Logistics (TQL) v. Cox and Montgomery v. Caribe II challenge whether state-law negligence claims against brokers for hiring unsafe motor carriers are preempted by federal law or fall under a safety exception. The Eleventh and Seventh Circuits have ruled such claims are preempted, while the Ninth and Sixth Circuits have allowed them, creating a legal inconsistency across jurisdictions. The Supreme Court's decision could clarify these conflicting rulings and impact risk management for brokers and shippers operating across state lines.

The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to resolve a split among circuit courts regarding freight broker liability under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA). The cases Total Quality Logistics (TQL) v. Cox and Montgomery v. Caribe II challenge whether state-law negligence claims against brokers for hiring unsafe motor carriers are preempted by federal law or fall under a safety exception. The Eleventh and Seventh Circuits have ruled such claims are preempted, while the Ninth and Sixth Circuits have allowed them, creating a legal inconsistency across jurisdictions. The Supreme Court's decision could clarify these conflicting rulings and impact risk management for brokers and shippers operating across state lines.

New York City renters have filed numerous complaints under the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses (FARE) Act, which mandates that landlords pay broker fees instead of renters. The Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) has received over 1,100 complaints since the law's implementation, but enforcement has been slow, with only a few cases settled. Renters are encouraged to report violations, but many lack the necessary evidence or time to do so. The article discusses the challenges renters face in navigating the rental market and the importance of reporting illegal broker practices.

New York City renters have filed numerous complaints under the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses (FARE) Act, which mandates that landlords pay broker fees instead of renters. The Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) has received over 1,100 complaints since the law's implementation, but enforcement has been slow, with only a few cases settled. Renters are encouraged to report violations, but many lack the necessary evidence or time to do so. The article discusses the challenges renters face in navigating the rental market and the importance of reporting illegal broker practices.

The content provides a comprehensive overview of brokers, defining them as intermediaries between investors and securities exchanges. It distinguishes between two main types of brokers: full-service brokers, who offer a range of services including investment advice, and discount brokers, who provide limited services at lower costs. The article explains the regulatory requirements for brokers, the roles of real estate brokers, and how the rise of online brokerages has made investing more accessible. It also discusses the compensation structures for brokers and the importance of brokers in facilitating trades and providing market intelligence.

The content provides a comprehensive overview of brokers, defining them as intermediaries between investors and securities exchanges. It distinguishes between two main types of brokers: full-service brokers, who offer a range of services including investment advice, and discount brokers, who provide limited services at lower costs. The article explains the regulatory requirements for brokers, the roles of real estate brokers, and how the rise of online brokerages has made investing more accessible. It also discusses the compensation structures for brokers and the importance of brokers in facilitating trades and providing market intelligence.

building-icon由TrustFinance AI分析提供
Review analysis image

AI评论分析

让TrustFinance AI为您总结所有评论。

Trustfinance icon

由TrustFinance AI分析提供

Review analysis image

AI评论分析

让TrustFinance AI为您总结所有评论。

Trustfinance icon

由TrustFinance AI分析提供