THIS SERVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE IN YOUR REGION

Afm

Germany

Founded in

1993 (33 Years)

Founded

Last online: No recent activity

Claim company Visit website

TrustScore unavailableNot enough score to display the trend.

Be the first to rate and review this company.

OVERALL SCORE

Licenses

--/40

Reviews

--/60

0 reviews

Provided by TrustFinance

TrustScore unavailableNot enough score to display the trend.

Be the first to rate and review this company.

Regulated

Recommended

IUX

(2,283 reviews)

Mauritius

2016

(10 years)

Security Information :

FSCA

FSC

ASIC

Security Information

Warning

This company is currently Unproved.

Please be cautious of the potential risks!

License

A Grade License

Issued by globally renowned regulators, these licenses ensure the highest trader protection through strict compliance, fund segregation, insurance, and regular audits. Dispute resolution and adherence to AML/CTF standards further enhance security.

B Grade License

Granted by respected regional regulators, these licenses offer robust safety measures such as fund segregation, financial reporting, and compensation schemes. Though slightly less strict than Tier 1, they provide dependable regional protection.

C Grade License

Issued by regulators in emerging markets, these licenses offer basic protections such as minimum capital requirements and AML policies. Oversight is less stringent, so traders should exercise caution and verify safety measures.

D Grade License

From jurisdictions with minimal oversight, these licenses often lack key protections like fund segregation and insurance. While attractive for operational flexibility, they pose higher risks to traders.

Reviews

Afm Reviews

Reviews

Total 0

Sort by

Filter

TrustFinance Intelligence Agency

Research date: Jun 28, 2026

The article discusses a new obligation for insurance brokers in the Netherlands, effective from July 1, 2024, requiring them to actively inform consumers about the commissions they receive from insurers before concluding a contract. This change aims to enhance consumer awareness and engagement regarding insurance costs. Previously, brokers were only required to disclose commission information if asked by consumers. The new 'active transparency obligation' is intended to empower consumers to better assess and compare the services provided by their brokers. The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has expressed expectations regarding compliance, although some aspects remain unclear.

The article discusses a new obligation for insurance brokers in the Netherlands, effective from July 1, 2024, requiring them to actively inform consumers about the commissions they receive from insurers before concluding a contract. This change aims to enhance consumer awareness and engagement regarding insurance costs. Previously, brokers were only required to disclose commission information if asked by consumers. The new 'active transparency obligation' is intended to empower consumers to better assess and compare the services provided by their brokers. The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has expressed expectations regarding compliance, although some aspects remain unclear.

The website provides a comparison between IC Markets and TradeStation, highlighting their ratings, tradable assets, account features, fees, and regulatory information. IC Markets has a higher rating (4.6) compared to TradeStation (4.3) and offers a minimum deposit of $200, while TradeStation has no minimum deposit. Both brokers have various account features, including different order types and trading fees.

The website provides a comparison between IC Markets and TradeStation, highlighting their ratings, tradable assets, account features, fees, and regulatory information. IC Markets has a higher rating (4.6) compared to TradeStation (4.3) and offers a minimum deposit of $200, while TradeStation has no minimum deposit. Both brokers have various account features, including different order types and trading fees.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has analyzed payment for order flow (PFOF) trading venues and found that they consistently provide worse execution prices for retail clients. PFOF, which is prohibited in the Netherlands, incentivizes brokers to prioritize payments over the best outcomes for clients. The AFM has shared its analysis method with other EU supervisory authorities to promote a uniform approach to assessing order execution quality. Recent updates to their findings confirm that PFOF venues underperform compared to both quoted and actual execution prices.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has analyzed payment for order flow (PFOF) trading venues and found that they consistently provide worse execution prices for retail clients. PFOF, which is prohibited in the Netherlands, incentivizes brokers to prioritize payments over the best outcomes for clients. The AFM has shared its analysis method with other EU supervisory authorities to promote a uniform approach to assessing order execution quality. Recent updates to their findings confirm that PFOF venues underperform compared to both quoted and actual execution prices.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has fined BinckBank N.V. €530,000 for not having adequate procedures to ensure that clients only invested in financial products suitable for their target market between December 2019 and December 2021. The AFM found that BinckBank's product governance policy was insufficiently detailed, lacking specific criteria for determining target markets and ensuring appropriate product distribution. Following an order from the AFM in June 2022, BinckBank has since complied with statutory requirements. The fine was reduced from €625,000 due to BinckBank's cooperation during the investigation.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has fined BinckBank N.V. €530,000 for not having adequate procedures to ensure that clients only invested in financial products suitable for their target market between December 2019 and December 2021. The AFM found that BinckBank's product governance policy was insufficiently detailed, lacking specific criteria for determining target markets and ensuring appropriate product distribution. Following an order from the AFM in June 2022, BinckBank has since complied with statutory requirements. The fine was reduced from €625,000 due to BinckBank's cooperation during the investigation.

Provided by TrustFinance AI Analysis

News

TrustFinance Intelligence Agency

Research date: Jun 28, 2026

The article discusses a new obligation for insurance brokers in the Netherlands, effective from July 1, 2024, requiring them to actively inform consumers about the commissions they receive from insurers before concluding a contract. This change aims to enhance consumer awareness and engagement regarding insurance costs. Previously, brokers were only required to disclose commission information if asked by consumers. The new 'active transparency obligation' is intended to empower consumers to better assess and compare the services provided by their brokers. The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has expressed expectations regarding compliance, although some aspects remain unclear.

The website provides a comparison between IC Markets and TradeStation, highlighting their ratings, tradable assets, account features, fees, and regulatory information. IC Markets has a higher rating (4.6) compared to TradeStation (4.3) and offers a minimum deposit of $200, while TradeStation has no minimum deposit. Both brokers have various account features, including different order types and trading fees.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has analyzed payment for order flow (PFOF) trading venues and found that they consistently provide worse execution prices for retail clients. PFOF, which is prohibited in the Netherlands, incentivizes brokers to prioritize payments over the best outcomes for clients. The AFM has shared its analysis method with other EU supervisory authorities to promote a uniform approach to assessing order execution quality. Recent updates to their findings confirm that PFOF venues underperform compared to both quoted and actual execution prices.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has fined BinckBank N.V. €530,000 for not having adequate procedures to ensure that clients only invested in financial products suitable for their target market between December 2019 and December 2021. The AFM found that BinckBank's product governance policy was insufficiently detailed, lacking specific criteria for determining target markets and ensuring appropriate product distribution. Following an order from the AFM in June 2022, BinckBank has since complied with statutory requirements. The fine was reduced from €625,000 due to BinckBank's cooperation during the investigation.

Provided by TrustFinance AI Analysis

Afm

Security Information

Company Information

Reviews

Afm

Security Information

Company Information

Users who look Afm also look…

IUX

XM

FXGT

Deriv

Exness

News

TrustFinance Intelligence Agency

Reviews

Users who look Afm also look…

IUX

XM

FXGT

Deriv

Exness

News

TrustFinance Intelligence Agency