trustfinance-logo

TrustFinance

  • 新

  • 博客

TW

    • 投票
    • 獎項
    • 獎勵新
  • 行業
    • 規例
    • 比較
  • 博客
    • 關於我們
    • 見證
    • 法律
    • 點解 TrustFinance
    • TrustFinance 點樣運作
    • 報告
外匯
加密貨幣
股票
財務
媒體
科技
TrustFinance logo

TrustFinance

最值得信賴的平台

辦公室: 63 Chulia Street, OCBC Centre East, #15-01, Singapore, 049514
主要聯繫方式:
[email protected]-技術支援和諮詢
[email protected]-免費在線聲譽諮詢服務
[email protected]-銷售諮詢
營業時間:週一至週五 (11:00-19:00)
時區(新加坡)

功能

  • 首頁
  • 投票
  • 獎項
  • 獎勵新
  • 部落格
  • 法規
  • 比較

行業

  • 加密貨幣
  • 金融
  • 外匯
  • 媒體
  • 股票
  • 科技

商業版

  • 商業主頁
  • 申請演示
  • 解決方案
  • 套餐與定價
  • 活動

我們的公司

  • 關於我們
  • 推薦信
  • TrustFinance如何運作
  • 為何選擇TrustFinance
  • 法律
  • 報告
  • 網站地圖
DMCA.com Protection Status
版權所有 © TrustFinance 2022 | V.2.0

TrustFinance是您可以信賴的值得信賴且準確的信息。如果您正在尋找金融商業信息,這裡就是您的最佳選擇。金融商業信息的一站式來源。我們的首要任務是可靠性。

功能
  • 首頁
  • 投票
  • 獎項
  • 獎勵新
  • 部落格
  • 法規
  • 比較
行業
  • 加密貨幣
  • 金融
  • 外匯
  • 媒體
  • 股票
  • 科技
商業版
  • 商業主頁
  • 申請演示
  • 解決方案
  • 套餐與定價
  • 活動
我們的公司
  • 關於我們
  • 推薦信
  • TrustFinance如何運作
  • 為何選擇TrustFinance
  • 法律
  • 報告
  • 網站地圖

社群

辦公室: 63 Chulia Street, OCBC Centre East, #15-01, Singapore, 049514
主要聯繫方式:
[email protected]-技術支援和諮詢
[email protected]-免費在線聲譽諮詢服務
[email protected]-銷售諮詢
營業時間:週一至週五 (11:00-19:00)
時區(新加坡)
DMCA.com Protection Status
版權所有 © TrustFinance 2022 | V.2.0

TrustFinance是您可以信賴的值得信賴且準確的信息。如果您正在尋找金融商業信息,這裡就是您的最佳選擇。金融商業信息的一站式來源。我們的首要任務是可靠性。

外匯
navigate next零售經紀navigate next A.C.T.

關於公司

  • 概覽
  • 資訊
  • 評論
Service not available icon
此服務在您所在的地區不可用。
A
A
A

A.C.T.

National flag images
National flag images

英國

成立於

2002 (24 年)

成立

最後上線: 最近無活動

訪問網站

暫無 TrustScore分數不足,無法顯示趨勢。

成為首個為該公司評分與評論的使用者。

綜合得分
牌照
--/40
評論
--/60
0 則評價

由 TrustFinance 提供

暫無 TrustScore分數不足,無法顯示趨勢。

成為首個為該公司評分與評論的使用者。

Markets.com

Markets.com

(326 評論)

foundedInUnited States

2008

(18 年)

安全資訊 :

FSCA

安全資訊

警告

該公司目前 未經證實.

請注意潛在風險!

Note icon

牌照

甲級牌照

由全球知名監管機構頒發,這些許可證透過嚴格的合規性、資金隔離、保險和定期審計,確保最高程度的交易者保護。爭議解決和遵守 AML/CTF 標準進一步提高了安全性。

B 級牌照

由受尊敬的區域監管機構授予,這些許可證提供強大的安全措施,例如資金隔離、財務報告和補償計劃。雖然沒有等級 1 那麼嚴格,但它們提供可靠的區域保護。

C 級牌照

由新興市場的監管機構頒發,這些許可證提供基本保護,例如最低資本要求和 AML 政策。監管較不嚴格,因此交易者應謹慎行事並驗證安全措施。

D 級牌照

來自監管最少的司法管轄區,這些許可證通常缺乏關鍵保護,例如資金隔離和保險。雖然它們對營運彈性很有吸引力,但它們對交易者構成較高的風險。

公司資料

building-icon

了解 A.C.T.

顯示更多

navigate-icon
building-icon

公司資料

了解 A.C.T.

A.C.T. BROKERS LTD operates as an international online broker providing access to over 1,000 financial instruments through its trading platform. The company's stated mission is to offer exceptional trading conditions, including tight spreads, advanced technology, and dedicated customer support, to a global client base.

顯示更多

navigate-icon

行業

  • 外匯 零售經紀主要
  • 財務 其他服務

軟件

無可用數據

呢個部分好似係空嘅。 快啲返嚟睇更新!

聯絡

location-contact-icon

-

website-contact-icon

-

phone-contact-icon

-

email-contact-icon

-

社交

公司尚未更新其資訊。

評論

Social scout image

Social Scout

睇吓Social Scout搵到A.C.T.嘅嘢

Trustfinance icon

由TrustFinance AI分析提供

A.C.T. 評論

評論

總計 0

濾鏡

5 星

0%

4 星

0%

3 星

0%

2 星

0%

1 星

0%

排序

濾鏡

睇A.C.T.嘅用戶仲睇…

building-icon

IUX

88
building-icon

XM

85
building-icon

FXGT

25
building-icon

Deriv

51
building-icon

Exness

53
building-icon

IUX

88
building-icon

XM

85
building-icon

FXGT

25
building-icon

Deriv

51
building-icon

Exness

53

新聞

building-icon

TrustFinance 情報機構

研究日期: 5月 14, 2026

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has launched a dedicated Data Broker Enforcement Strike Force to enhance oversight of data brokers under the California Delete Act and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). The Delete Act, effective since 2024, imposes new registration and compliance requirements on data brokers, including an annual fee and obligations to report consumer data deletion requests. Non-compliance can lead to significant fines and operational restrictions. Businesses must assess their status as data brokers, register annually, implement deletion request processes, and ensure compliance with data handling regulations to avoid penalties.

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has launched a dedicated Data Broker Enforcement Strike Force to enhance oversight of data brokers under the California Delete Act and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). The Delete Act, effective since 2024, imposes new registration and compliance requirements on data brokers, including an annual fee and obligations to report consumer data deletion requests. Non-compliance can lead to significant fines and operational restrictions. Businesses must assess their status as data brokers, register annually, implement deletion request processes, and ensure compliance with data handling regulations to avoid penalties.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) reported record-breaking False Claims Act (FCA) recoveries of over $6.8 billion in 2025, with more than $5.7 billion related to healthcare. The report highlights aggressive enforcement trends, including a focus on improper marketing practices, kickbacks, and substandard care. Key cases involved significant settlements against pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers for fraudulent activities. The DOJ emphasized the importance of compliance and the role of whistleblowers in these enforcement actions. Stakeholders are advised to enhance compliance strategies in light of the evolving enforcement landscape.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) reported record-breaking False Claims Act (FCA) recoveries of over $6.8 billion in 2025, with more than $5.7 billion related to healthcare. The report highlights aggressive enforcement trends, including a focus on improper marketing practices, kickbacks, and substandard care. Key cases involved significant settlements against pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers for fraudulent activities. The DOJ emphasized the importance of compliance and the role of whistleblowers in these enforcement actions. Stakeholders are advised to enhance compliance strategies in light of the evolving enforcement landscape.

The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to resolve a split among circuit courts regarding freight broker liability under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA). The cases Total Quality Logistics (TQL) v. Cox and Montgomery v. Caribe II challenge whether state-law negligence claims against brokers for hiring unsafe motor carriers are preempted by federal law or fall under a safety exception. The Eleventh and Seventh Circuits have ruled such claims are preempted, while the Ninth and Sixth Circuits have allowed them, creating a legal inconsistency across jurisdictions. The Supreme Court's decision could clarify these conflicting rulings and impact risk management for brokers and shippers operating across state lines.

The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to resolve a split among circuit courts regarding freight broker liability under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA). The cases Total Quality Logistics (TQL) v. Cox and Montgomery v. Caribe II challenge whether state-law negligence claims against brokers for hiring unsafe motor carriers are preempted by federal law or fall under a safety exception. The Eleventh and Seventh Circuits have ruled such claims are preempted, while the Ninth and Sixth Circuits have allowed them, creating a legal inconsistency across jurisdictions. The Supreme Court's decision could clarify these conflicting rulings and impact risk management for brokers and shippers operating across state lines.

New York City renters have filed numerous complaints under the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses (FARE) Act, which mandates that landlords pay broker fees instead of renters. The Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) has received over 1,100 complaints since the law's implementation, but enforcement has been slow, with only a few cases settled. Renters are encouraged to report violations, but many lack the necessary evidence or time to do so. The article discusses the challenges renters face in navigating the rental market and the importance of reporting illegal broker practices.

New York City renters have filed numerous complaints under the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses (FARE) Act, which mandates that landlords pay broker fees instead of renters. The Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) has received over 1,100 complaints since the law's implementation, but enforcement has been slow, with only a few cases settled. Renters are encouraged to report violations, but many lack the necessary evidence or time to do so. The article discusses the challenges renters face in navigating the rental market and the importance of reporting illegal broker practices.

The content provides a comprehensive overview of brokers, defining them as intermediaries between investors and securities exchanges. It distinguishes between two main types of brokers: full-service brokers, who offer a range of services including investment advice, and discount brokers, who provide limited services at lower costs. The article explains the regulatory requirements for brokers, the roles of real estate brokers, and how the rise of online brokerages has made investing more accessible. It also discusses the compensation structures for brokers and the importance of brokers in facilitating trades and providing market intelligence.

The content provides a comprehensive overview of brokers, defining them as intermediaries between investors and securities exchanges. It distinguishes between two main types of brokers: full-service brokers, who offer a range of services including investment advice, and discount brokers, who provide limited services at lower costs. The article explains the regulatory requirements for brokers, the roles of real estate brokers, and how the rise of online brokerages has made investing more accessible. It also discusses the compensation structures for brokers and the importance of brokers in facilitating trades and providing market intelligence.

building-icon由TrustFinance AI分析提供
Review analysis image

AI 評論分析

讓TrustFinance AI為你總結所有評論。

Trustfinance icon

由TrustFinance AI分析提供

Review analysis image

AI 評論分析

讓TrustFinance AI為你總結所有評論。

Trustfinance icon

由TrustFinance AI分析提供