이 서비스는 귀하의 지역에서 사용할 수 없습니다.

Afm

독일

설립된

1993 (33 년)

설립됨

마지막 접속: 최근 활동 없음

청구 회사 웹사이트 방문

TrustScore 없음추세를 표시하기에 점수가 부족합니다.

이 회사에 첫 평가와 리뷰를 남겨 보세요.

종합 점수

라이선스

--/40

리뷰

--/60

리뷰 0개

TrustFinance 제공

TrustScore 없음추세를 표시하기에 점수가 부족합니다.

이 회사에 첫 평가와 리뷰를 남겨 보세요.

Markets.com

(326 리뷰)

United States

२००८

(18 년)

보안 정보 :

FSCA

보안 정보

경고

이 회사는 현재 입증되지 않은.

잠재적인 위험에 주의하십시오!

면허

A급 면허

전 세계적으로 유명한 규제 기관에서 발급한 이 라이선스는 엄격한 규정 준수, 자금 분리, 보험 및 정기 감사를 통해 거래자에게 최고의 보호를 보장합니다. 분쟁 해결 및 AML/CTF 표준 준수는 보안을 더욱 강화합니다.

B급 면허

존경받는 지역 규제 기관에서 부여하는 이 라이선스는 자금 분리, 재무 보고 및 보상 제도와 같은 강력한 안전 조치를 제공합니다. 티어 1만큼 엄격하지는 않지만 신뢰할 수 있는 지역 보호를 제공합니다.

C급 면허

신흥 시장의 규제 기관에서 발급한 이 라이선스는 최소 자본 요건 및 AML 정책과 같은 기본적인 보호 기능을 제공합니다. 감독이 덜 엄격하므로 거래자는 주의를 기울이고 안전 조치를 확인해야 합니다.

D급 면허

감독이 최소화된 관할권에서 발행된 이러한 라이선스는 종종 자금 분리 및 보험과 같은 주요 보호 기능이 부족합니다. 운영 유연성 측면에서는 매력적이지만 거래자에게 더 높은 위험을 초래합니다.

회사 정보

알아가기 Afm

회사 정보

알아가기 Afm

AFM is a brand name of AFM ONLINE LTD, an International Business Company registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. The company presents itself as a modern brokerage founded by experienced traders, aiming to provide a transparent and fair trading environment through state-of-the-art technology. It offers clients access to global financial markets via Contracts for Difference (CFDs) on its proprietary trading platforms.

산업

외환 소매 중개인기본
재정 보험
재정 기타 서비스

소프트웨어

데이터가 없습니다.

이 섹션은 비어 있는 것 같습니다. 곧 업데이트를 위해 다시 방문해 주세요!

연락처

소셜

리뷰

Afm 리뷰

리뷰

총 0

정렬 기준

필터

회사 정보

알아가기 Afm

회사 정보

알아가기 Afm

산업

외환 소매 중개인기본
재정 보험
재정 기타 서비스

소프트웨어

데이터가 없습니다.

이 섹션은 비어 있는 것 같습니다. 곧 업데이트를 위해 다시 방문해 주세요!

연락처

소셜

뉴스

TrustFinance 정보 기관

연구 날짜: जून २८, २०२६

The article discusses a new obligation for insurance brokers in the Netherlands, effective from July 1, 2024, requiring them to actively inform consumers about the commissions they receive from insurers before concluding a contract. This change aims to enhance consumer awareness and engagement regarding insurance costs. Previously, brokers were only required to disclose commission information if asked by consumers. The new 'active transparency obligation' is intended to empower consumers to better assess and compare the services provided by their brokers. The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has expressed expectations regarding compliance, although some aspects remain unclear.

The article discusses a new obligation for insurance brokers in the Netherlands, effective from July 1, 2024, requiring them to actively inform consumers about the commissions they receive from insurers before concluding a contract. This change aims to enhance consumer awareness and engagement regarding insurance costs. Previously, brokers were only required to disclose commission information if asked by consumers. The new 'active transparency obligation' is intended to empower consumers to better assess and compare the services provided by their brokers. The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has expressed expectations regarding compliance, although some aspects remain unclear.

The website provides a comparison between IC Markets and TradeStation, highlighting their ratings, tradable assets, account features, fees, and regulatory information. IC Markets has a higher rating (4.6) compared to TradeStation (4.3) and offers a minimum deposit of $200, while TradeStation has no minimum deposit. Both brokers have various account features, including different order types and trading fees.

The website provides a comparison between IC Markets and TradeStation, highlighting their ratings, tradable assets, account features, fees, and regulatory information. IC Markets has a higher rating (4.6) compared to TradeStation (4.3) and offers a minimum deposit of $200, while TradeStation has no minimum deposit. Both brokers have various account features, including different order types and trading fees.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has analyzed payment for order flow (PFOF) trading venues and found that they consistently provide worse execution prices for retail clients. PFOF, which is prohibited in the Netherlands, incentivizes brokers to prioritize payments over the best outcomes for clients. The AFM has shared its analysis method with other EU supervisory authorities to promote a uniform approach to assessing order execution quality. Recent updates to their findings confirm that PFOF venues underperform compared to both quoted and actual execution prices.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has analyzed payment for order flow (PFOF) trading venues and found that they consistently provide worse execution prices for retail clients. PFOF, which is prohibited in the Netherlands, incentivizes brokers to prioritize payments over the best outcomes for clients. The AFM has shared its analysis method with other EU supervisory authorities to promote a uniform approach to assessing order execution quality. Recent updates to their findings confirm that PFOF venues underperform compared to both quoted and actual execution prices.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has fined BinckBank N.V. €530,000 for not having adequate procedures to ensure that clients only invested in financial products suitable for their target market between December 2019 and December 2021. The AFM found that BinckBank's product governance policy was insufficiently detailed, lacking specific criteria for determining target markets and ensuring appropriate product distribution. Following an order from the AFM in June 2022, BinckBank has since complied with statutory requirements. The fine was reduced from €625,000 due to BinckBank's cooperation during the investigation.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has fined BinckBank N.V. €530,000 for not having adequate procedures to ensure that clients only invested in financial products suitable for their target market between December 2019 and December 2021. The AFM found that BinckBank's product governance policy was insufficiently detailed, lacking specific criteria for determining target markets and ensuring appropriate product distribution. Following an order from the AFM in June 2022, BinckBank has since complied with statutory requirements. The fine was reduced from €625,000 due to BinckBank's cooperation during the investigation.

트러스트파이낸스 AI 분석 제공

뉴스

TrustFinance 정보 기관

연구 날짜: जून २८, २०२६

The article discusses a new obligation for insurance brokers in the Netherlands, effective from July 1, 2024, requiring them to actively inform consumers about the commissions they receive from insurers before concluding a contract. This change aims to enhance consumer awareness and engagement regarding insurance costs. Previously, brokers were only required to disclose commission information if asked by consumers. The new 'active transparency obligation' is intended to empower consumers to better assess and compare the services provided by their brokers. The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has expressed expectations regarding compliance, although some aspects remain unclear.

The website provides a comparison between IC Markets and TradeStation, highlighting their ratings, tradable assets, account features, fees, and regulatory information. IC Markets has a higher rating (4.6) compared to TradeStation (4.3) and offers a minimum deposit of $200, while TradeStation has no minimum deposit. Both brokers have various account features, including different order types and trading fees.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has analyzed payment for order flow (PFOF) trading venues and found that they consistently provide worse execution prices for retail clients. PFOF, which is prohibited in the Netherlands, incentivizes brokers to prioritize payments over the best outcomes for clients. The AFM has shared its analysis method with other EU supervisory authorities to promote a uniform approach to assessing order execution quality. Recent updates to their findings confirm that PFOF venues underperform compared to both quoted and actual execution prices.

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) has fined BinckBank N.V. €530,000 for not having adequate procedures to ensure that clients only invested in financial products suitable for their target market between December 2019 and December 2021. The AFM found that BinckBank's product governance policy was insufficiently detailed, lacking specific criteria for determining target markets and ensuring appropriate product distribution. Following an order from the AFM in June 2022, BinckBank has since complied with statutory requirements. The fine was reduced from €625,000 due to BinckBank's cooperation during the investigation.

트러스트파이낸스 AI 분석 제공

Afm

보안 정보

회사 정보

리뷰

Afm

보안 정보

회사 정보

Afm 을(를) 본 사용자들은 또한…

IUX

XM

FXGT

Deriv

Exness

뉴스

TrustFinance 정보 기관

리뷰

Afm 을(를) 본 사용자들은 또한…

IUX

XM

FXGT

Deriv

Exness

뉴스

TrustFinance 정보 기관